<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Natural Diabetics &#187; stevia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/tag/stevia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com</link>
	<description>Natural Remedies for Diabetes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Artificial Sweeteners</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/artificial-sweeteners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/artificial-sweeteners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Wheeler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healing Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial sweetener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspartame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoimmune disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carb counting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulin resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucralose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natural.infotrustllc.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Talk about a hotbed of                          controversy! Yes, I list them as a helpful item. And                ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><strong>Talk about a hotbed of                          controversy! Yes, I list them as a helpful item. And                          I can justify my reasoning.</strong></p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/cookies.jpg" border="0" alt="Artificial Sweeteners" hspace="3" width="250" height="97" align="right" />First of all, many sources                          that condemn artificial sweeteners are either defending                          the sugar industry, or individuals who are looking for                          an excuse to not have to stop having as much sugar as                          they want (some are naturalists who feel that anything                          chemical is bad, but that is another issue).<strong> I know a lot of people who become very nasty                          once you suggest that sugar ought not be consumed in                          the large amounts that many people use it in.</strong> It is                          almost tantamount to blasphemy to suggest that sugar                          might be harmful to some people!</p>
<p><strong>Sugar was never meant                          to be eaten as a daily staple, but it is now considered                          to be just that. It is not until you try to eliminated                          it that you realize just how much is put into everything                          we eat. </strong></p>
<p>Artificial sweeteners                          are also not meant to be consumed with every meal. Yes,                          they are chemicals, and yes, they can have adverse affects                          (in which case you can stop using them!). But get this:</p>
<p><strong>Occasional servings                          of artificial sweeteners are a whole lot less harmful                          than sugar in the amounts that most people use!</strong></p>
<p>One of the claims made                          by dieters against artificial sweeteners is that they                          may cause a release of insulin. The theory is that as                          the sweet taste hits your tongue, your body gets ready                          for a sugar load, and releases insulin in expectation,                          so they can cause a blood sugar low, causing cravings,                          and blow your diet.<strong> This is pretty much bilgewater.                          If such a reaction does occur, it resolves itself very                          rapidly. </strong>The human body adjusts easily to changes, and                          after two or three times of not getting the anticipated                          sugar, it stops releasing the insulin. After a                          few days, the issue resolves. It is not a significant                          reason to avoid these products, only a reason to monitor                          your sugars and see if something does happen, and make                          accommodations until your body adjusts, which it WILL                          do!</p>
<p>I use Splenda when I really need a sweet item and                          cannot afford the extra carbs for a sugar sweetened                          treat. My diet is so strict that most items with sugar                          are simply too high in carbs for me. I choose not to use Aspartame because I do not consider it to be safe for pregnancy or trying to conceive.</p>
<p><strong>Sugar also has a negative                          affect that Splenda and Aspartame do not&#8230; It sets                          up a craving cycle in me that makes me want more sweet                          items.</strong> That craving is very hard to control! I find                          that if I have a sugar item, it is best late in the                          day, when it won&#8217;t make me crave sugar for the rest                          of the day.<strong> Some people say that aspartame makes you                          crave carbohydrates, but again, that is merely a limited                          reaction during the first few days of sugar withdrawal,                          and not a permanent affect.</strong></p>
<p>When someone is first                          kicking the sugar habit (which can be an actual addiction                          in some people), it takes about a week for the cravings                          to subside. During that time, artificially sweetened                          items can be a lifesaver! They can get you over the                          hump without perpetuating the cravings &#8211; it helps if                          you avoid sugarfree items that have no calories during                          the first few days, since they do not satisfy your body&#8217;s                          need for carbohydrates.</p>
<p>Later, when the habit                          is kicked, but you still crave a treat now and again,                          they can help you to keep the good habits. But they should not be used on a daily basis any more than sugar should.</p>
<p>If you use sodas on a                          daily basis, soft drinks with artificial sweeteners                          more than a few times a week, or eat sugarfree candies                          all the time, then these sweeteners have a good chance                          of doing you harm long term. Regular high use of aspartame                    is what is responsible for the negative reports about its                    safety (yes, it really CAN contribute to male impotence, and                    can cause mood disturbances, but only when consumed in significant                    amounts), and I can almost guarantee that Splenda or Stevia                    would have similar negative affects if consumed regularly in high quantities.</p>
<p>Regular consumption means,                    more than one small serving a day of foods which contain the                    additive. One reason I use more than one type of artificial                    sweetener is so that I don&#8217;t overload on any single one. I                    don&#8217;t usually use them even once a day, and varying their                    use helps make sure that the long term affects of any of them                    are less.</p>
<p>Moderation is the rule,                          with either sugar, or artificial sweeteners. If you                          use them right, they can be a very helpful tool to ease                          some of the harder times of tightly controlling a diet,                          and there is no need to feel guilty or like you have                          to justify their use if you are using them wisely in                          your                          diet, it could be a good thing to try. It is readily                          available, and need not be expensive.</p>
<p>Remember, you don&#8217;t NEED a                    soda every day. If you have a soda every day, no matter WHAT                    it is flavored with, it is going to cause you harm! Save it                    for a rare treat on a hot day, and take bottled water with                    you instead!</p>
<p>If you prefer a natural                          alternative to artificial sweeteners, check out the                          page on Stevia.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/artificial-sweeteners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stevia</title>
		<link>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/stevia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/stevia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Wheeler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diabetes Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herbal & Vitamin Supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoimmune disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carb counting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal supplement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulin resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevia leaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://natural.infotrustllc.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Another hotbed of controversy,                          partly because it is tied in with the wrangle over artificial                ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><strong>Another hotbed of controversy,                          partly because it is tied in with the wrangle over artificial                          sweeteners. We cannot determine whether to class it as an herb, or a food! And neither can the FDA. </strong></p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/stevia.jpg" border="0" alt="Stevia" hspace="3" width="250" height="181" align="right" />I am not an extremist.                          I generally believe the truth to be somewhere between                          what the proponents of each philosophy are claiming                          in most controversies. And that is how I feel about                          this one. I do not believe that stevia is without risks,                          nor do I believe that aspartame is the &#8220;most dangerous                          substance masquerading as food to ever be foisted off                          on the unsuspecting public&#8221; (though I do know from personal experience that it can be harmful). I do not believe that                          there is a conspiracy to keep people eating sugar or                          aspartame.</p>
<p><strong>I DO believe that there                          are major profit motives at stake.</strong> But they are there                          on BOTH sides of the issues, whether the people promoting                          stevia admit it or not. They claim there is no profit                          in stevia, but there is. And brand names are EVERYTHING,                          so if someone got it approved by the FDA, and promoted                          brand recognition across the US, they&#8217;d have a sweet                          marketing deal the same as NutraSweet does. There are                          many brands of aspartame, but NutraSweet is THE brand,                          and it is what the fortunes have been made around.</p>
<p><strong>So, motives aside, stevia                          is a powerful natural sweetener from the leaves of a                          plant that is native to South America. It comes in green                          leaf forms, or in white extract forms, or in a liquid                          extract. A little pinch goes a long way.</strong></p>
<p>Because stevia is an                          herb, in the green leaf form, it may have other health                          affects. There are certainly some who claim that it                          not only eliminates the need for sugar, but that it,                          in itself, has the power to reduce blood sugar levels.                          In fact, someone out there is willing to claim that                          it can help just about every major condition from which                          a huge number of people are known to suffer.<strong> I am more                    than a                          bit skeptical about that, but feel that the jury is                          still out on any other benefits besides just being a                          calorie-free sweetener.</strong></p>
<p>Too date, the FDA has                          denied approval of this as a food additive, and only                          allows it to be marketed as an herbal supplement, not                          as a sweetener. They say it fails to meet their safety                          guidelines, because it does not have a proven history                          of safety. Kind of funny they should say that, since                          coffee, caffeine, and even sugar itself would probably                          fail to meet those standards if tested today.</p>
<p><strong>However the arguments                          resolve, you can find stevia in health food stores,                          and there is plenty of info on how to use it. </strong>Be aware                          though, that it is likely to have other affects, which                          are not well known, so as with all herbs, you should be                          on the alert for problems.</p>
<p>I have been using this to sweeten                    tea, and a little in baking. I use packets, which are stevia                    blended with maltodextrin (another simple sugar &#8211; not enough                    of it to have to count it unless you use a lot). I find that                    one packet will sweeten a large mug of tea, or a bowl of oatmeal.                    If I use too much of it, it gets a sickly sweet taste.</p>
<p>In cooking, we use about a                    third the amount that would normally be used in a sugar to                    stevia conversion. If you use the full amount, the flavor                    gets way too strong.</p>
<p>Stevia has the unusual effect                    of leaving a residual taste on your lips. If you get a bit                    on your lips, you can lick them several times and still taste                    a bit of sweet flavor.</p>
<p>I consider it to be a reasonable                    alternative to sugar, but still use it cautiously, just as                    I do all artificial sweeteners. Stevia is recommended as natural,                    but in the extracted form, is really not any different from                    other chemical sweeteners, and should be used with similar                    restraint.</p>
<p>We can now find it in our grocery                    store, next to the &#8220;natural&#8221; forms of sugar.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.naturaldiabetics.com/stevia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
